Study of Clinical Outcome Following Cervical Spine Surgery

 A recent study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent ventral and dorsal cervical spine surgery. It found that both types of surgery were associated with a high rate of complication and were not equally effective in relieving neck pain. However, the study also found significant differences between the two surgical techniques, with ventral fusion being associated with a 47.0% higher complication rate than dorsal laminoplasty.

The study compared fusion with laminoplasty for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. In addition, the authors noted that there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two surgical groups. The authors concluded that there may have been a selection bias in the dorsal group, and laminoplasty may have been associated with a lower degree of cervical myelopathy in patients who received fusion. In addition, the study's low MCIDs were also likely due to underpowered analysis of pain rating scales and NDI scores. Further, the authors concluded that a rigid cervical collar can provide pain and disability relief.

The inclusion criteria were defined a priori. Inclusion criteria included studies conducted in English language, comparing patients with cervical fusion with those who did not. Moreover, any cervical bracing technique was considered. Nonclinical studies, opinion papers, and reviews of the literature were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of interest was the fusion rates, but secondary outcomes included complications, pain, and patient-reported outcomes. get consultation with top spine surgeon in bangalore.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Check Your Spine For Misalignment

What Happens If the Spinal Cord is Damaged?

4 Tips to Help Recover From a Back Injury